🔗 Share this article

For Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series did not happen during the tense finale on Saturday, when her squad executed one death-defying escape feat after another and then prevailing in extra innings against the Toronto Blue Jays.

It happened in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning sequence that at the same time challenged numerous harmful misconceptions promoted about Latinos in the past decades.

The moment in itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, game-winning play. Rojas, positioned nearby, caught the ball moments before a opposing player collided with him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't merely a remarkable athletic achievement, possibly the decisive turn in momentum in the team's favor after appearing for much of the series like the underdog team. To her, it was thrilling, politically and culturally, a badly needed uplift for Latinos and for Los Angeles after months of immigration raids, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of criticism from national leaders.

"Kike and Miggy presented this counter-narrative," said the professor. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, being key figures on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of confidence. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"It was such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be demoralized right now."

Not that it's entirely simple to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who attend regularly to matches and occupy as many as 50% of the venue's 50,000 seats each time.

The Mixed Relationship with the Team

When aggressive enforcement operations began in the city in June, and military units were deployed into the city to respond to ensuing protests, two of the local soccer clubs quickly issued messages of solidarity with immigrant families – while the baseball team.

The team president has said the Dodgers prefer to stay away of politics – a stance colored, possibly, by the reality that a sizable minority of the fans, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain political figures. After significant public pressure, the team subsequently committed $one million in support for families personally affected by the operations but made no public criticism of the government.

Official Event and Historical Heritage

Three months before, the organization did not delay in agreeing to an offer to mark their 2024 World Series victory at the White House – a decision that sports writers labeled as "disappointing … weak … and hypocritical", given the team's boast in having been the pioneering major league franchise to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that legacy and the values it represents by officials and current and former athletes. Several players such as the coach had voiced reluctance to travel to the White House during the first term but then reconsidered or succumbed to demands from the organization.

Business Ownership and Fan Conflicts

A further complication for fans is that the Dodgers are owned by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own released balance sheets, include a share in a detention corporation that runs detention centers. The group's executives has said repeatedly that it aims to remain neutral of political matters, but its detractors say the inaction – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to certain agendas.

These factors contribute to significant conflicted emotions among Hispanic supporters in especial – feelings that emerged even in the excitement of this season's hard-won championship triumph and the ensuing explosion of Dodgers support across Los Angeles.

"Can one to root for the team?" local writer one observer agonized at the start of the postseason in an elegant essay ruminating on "team loyalty in our veins, but doubt in our hearts". Galindo was unable to finally bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still felt deeply, to the extent that he believed his one-man boycott must have given the squad the fortune it needed to succeed.

Distinguishing the Players from the Owners

Numerous supporters who share Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to support the team and its lineup of international players, including the Asian superstar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's business overlords. Nowhere was this more evident than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on Monday, when the packed audience cheered in approval of the manager and his players but booed the team president and the top official of the investors.

"These men in formal attire don't get to take our players from us," the fan said. "We've been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Past Background and Community Impact

The problem, however, goes further than only the team's current owners. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the late 1950s involved the city demolishing three low-income Latino neighborhoods on a hill overlooking the city center and then selling the land to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 album that documents the story has an impoverished worker at the stadium stating that the home he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most influential Latino writer and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic relationship between the team and its fanbase. He describes the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an undue, even unhealthy devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for years.

"They've acted around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the warmer months, when demands to boycott the organization over its absence of reaction to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable reality that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when downtown LA was under to a evening restriction.

Global Stars and Community Bonds

Separating the team from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {